Disinformation researchers are suing Marco Rubio — and the mechanism in the…
The fight over online safety research is no longer a fight about content moderation.
Selected reporting and analysis that develops an argument, examines evidence, or explains a system in depth.
AI doesn't understand anything yet.
The fight over online safety research is no longer a fight about content moderation.
When Vivek Raghavan saw ChatGPT for the first time, he faced a choice that defines the AI era for most of the world's population.
The question everyone asks about AI and jobs is the wrong question.
Three years ago, when I moved to Singapore for wealth accumulation and business scaling, I was struck by the sheer physical presence of the data infrastructure around me.
The cost of building a frontier AI model has crossed significant financial thresholds in training compute alone, and the countries that cannot pay that price are not waiting around for charity.
A sophisticated iPhone hacking toolkit called Coruna — likely developed by US government contractors — has proliferated from American intelligence through Russian espionage operations to cybercriminals, infecting an estimated 42,000 devices and exposing the structural contradictions of government-funded offensive cyber capabilities.
The feeling that upward mobility is impossible isn't a personal failing — it's a signal produced by layered systems of credentialing, housing, networks, and tax architecture designed to compound advantage for those who already have it.
The people building the most consequential AI systems are also the ones buying escape plans from the world those systems will reshape. This isn't just hypocrisy — it reveals a structural problem about who bears the risks of transformative technology and who gets to walk away.